**Congress Blocks Stricter Pollution Control for California Cars**

Chamber
senate

15 days ago - Politics

Congress Blocks New Pollution Control Rules for California Cars

In a recent vote, Congress approved a resolution that stops the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from putting new pollution control rules into action for cars and engines in California. The resolution passed by a vote of 51 to 44 in the Senate, primarily supported by Republican members.

This decision means that California will not be able to enforce stricter rules aimed at reducing air pollution from vehicles. These rules, known as “Advanced Clean Cars II,” would have allowed California to set its own tougher standards for emissions, which are pollutants released by cars that can harm air quality and public health.

By blocking these new car pollution standards, Congress has decided to keep the existing, less strict federal regulations. As a result, car manufacturers will not be required to follow the newer rules that were aimed at lowering the pollution levels from the vehicles they sell in California.

The importance of this action goes beyond California. It may also affect other states that look to California as an example for their own pollution control efforts. Because Congress made this decision, it suggests that controlling pollution from cars will continue to follow older, less strict guidelines, which could lead to higher emissions over time.

Here are the main points about what this vote means:

  1. Congress does not approve the new, stricter pollution rules for California.
  2. It prevents tougher vehicle emissions requirements from taking effect.
  3. This could impact air quality not only in California but in other states as well.

The decision is likely to continue the challenge of ensuring cleaner air for everyone, as higher levels of vehicle emissions can lead to health problems in the long run.

This is a resolution that stops a rule from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) about car pollution standards in California.

  • Congress does not agree with the rule that sets rules for cleaner cars in California.
  • This rule is called "Advanced Clean Cars II."
  • Because of this resolution, the rule will have no effect.
  • The resolution was passed by the House of Representatives on May 1, 2025.

This decision means California cannot use this rule to control pollution from cars and engines as the EPA intended.

95 votes

Yes

51

No

44

Not Voting

5

  1. Message on Senate action sent to the House.
  2. Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 44. Record Vote Number: 277.
    Learn more
  3. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 44. Record Vote Number: 277.
    Learn more
  4. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S3101)
  5. Received in the Senate, read twice.
  6. Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S3052)
  7. Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 46. Record Vote Number: 276.
    Learn more
  8. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  9. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 246 - 164 (Roll no. 114). (text: 04/30/2025 CR H1749)
    Learn more
  10. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 246 - 164 (Roll no. 114). (text: 04/30/2025 CR H1749)
    Learn more
  11. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1786: 1)
  12. Engrossed in House

    This is a resolution that stops a rule from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) about car pollution standards in California.

    • Congress does not agree with the rule that sets rules for cleaner cars in California.
    • This rule is called "Advanced Clean Cars II."
    • Because of this resolution, the rule will have no effect.
    • The resolution was passed by the House of Representatives on May 1, 2025.

    This decision means California cannot use this rule to control pollution from cars and engines as the EPA intended.

  13. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.J. Res. 88, the Chair put the question on passage of the joint resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  14. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  15. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 88.
  16. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88 and H.J. Res. 89. The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res 88 and H.J. Res. 89 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each joint resolution.
  17. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 354. (consideration: CR H1748: 1)
  18. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 354 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88 and H The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88, and H.J. Res. 89 under a closed rule with one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each joint resolution.
  19. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1629)
  20. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1421)
  21. Introduced in House

    This is a resolution that says Congress disagrees with a rule from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) about cars in California.

    1. Main Point: Congress does not support the EPA's rule on California's car pollution standards. This means the rule will not be allowed to affect the laws.

    2. Details:

      • The rule deals with pollution control for cars and engines in California.
      • It was introduced to make cars cleaner and reduce pollution.
      • Congress took this action because they believe the rule should not be in place.
    3. Outcome: The disapproval means that California will not get the okay to follow these new pollution standards set by the EPA.

  22. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.