**Senate Rejects New Pollution Rules for Heavy Vehicles**

Chamber
senate

15 days ago - Politics

Senate Blocks New Pollution Rules for Heavy Vehicles

In a recent vote, the Senate decided to block new pollution rules for cars and trucks in California. The vote was close, with 51 senators supporting the decision and 45 voting against it. Most of the support came from Republican senators.

The rules that were blocked aimed to make heavy-duty vehicles, like trucks and buses, produce less pollution. These rules were designed to protect the environment by promoting cleaner air, including options for zero-emission vehicles, which don’t produce harmful exhaust emissions.

By rejecting these regulations, the Senate is allowing trucks and other heavy vehicles to continue operating with fewer restrictions. This means they can keep running without having to meet tougher pollution standards that would help reduce harmful emissions on busy roads.

Supporters of the decision say it helps businesses by reducing regulations and costs for manufacturers. However, critics express concern that this move will negatively affect air quality and public health, especially for people living near busy highways. They worry that without these rules, pollution levels will rise, leading to health issues for many communities.

This vote highlights a clash between those who prioritize economic interests and those who advocate for stricter environmental protections. While some see this decision as a victory for business, others fear it will lead to more pollution and a decline in air quality for everyone.

This is a law that says Congress does not agree with a rule made by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The rule was about controlling pollution from vehicles in California. It included things like:

  • Standards for heavy-duty vehicles and engines.
  • Rules for the emissions warranty and maintenance of these vehicles.
  • Plans for advanced clean trucks.
  • Zero-emission airport shuttles.
  • Certification for zero-emission power trains.

Since Congress disapproves of this rule, it will not go into effect. This means the EPA cannot enforce these guidelines in California.

96 votes

Yes

51

No

45

Not Voting

4

  1. Message on Senate action sent to the House.
  2. Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 45. Record Vote Number: 279.
    Learn more
  3. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 45. Record Vote Number: 279.
    Learn more
  4. Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S3102, S3105)
  5. Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 46. Record Vote Number: 278.
    Learn more
  6. Received in the Senate, read twice.
  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  8. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 231 - 191 (Roll no. 111). (text: CR H1741: 6)
    Learn more
  9. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 231 - 191 (Roll no. 111). (text: CR H1741: 6)
    Learn more
  10. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1759: 4)
  11. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.J. Res. 87, the Chair put the question on passage of the joint resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  12. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  13. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 87.
  14. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88 and H.J. Res. 89. The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88, and H.J. Res. 89 under a closed rule with one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each joint resolution.
  15. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 354. (consideration: CR H1741-1748: 6)
  16. Engrossed in House

    This is a law that says Congress does not agree with a rule made by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    The rule was about controlling pollution from vehicles in California. It included things like:

    • Standards for heavy-duty vehicles and engines.
    • Rules for the emissions warranty and maintenance of these vehicles.
    • Plans for advanced clean trucks.
    • Zero-emission airport shuttles.
    • Certification for zero-emission power trains.

    Since Congress disapproves of this rule, it will not go into effect. This means the EPA cannot enforce these guidelines in California.

  17. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 354 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88 and H The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88, and H.J. Res. 89 under a closed rule with one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each joint resolution.
  18. Introduced in House

    This is a resolution that says Congress does not agree with a rule from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    • The EPA's rule is about pollution control for vehicles in California.
    • It includes regulations for heavy-duty vehicles, clean trucks, and zero-emission airport shuttles.
    • Congress wants to block this rule, meaning it will not be enforced.

    This decision means that California will not have to follow these new vehicle pollution standards. It may impact air quality and vehicle emissions in the state.

  19. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  20. Introduced in House